IMPORTANT: See the original post in this series for an explanation of the methodology.

Regular readers know that I've been obsessing over the massive increases in both gross as well as net premiums for ACA health insurance policy enrollees being caused by the combination of Congressional Republicans allowing the enhanced federal tax credits to expire as well as other Trump Regime policy changes for well over a year and a half now.

The Trump Regime has published an update to the official Medicaid/CHIP enrollment data:

February 2026 Key Findings

Medicaid and CHIP Enrollment

  • In February 2026, 74.9 million individuals were enrolled in Medicaid and CHIP.
  • 67.7 million individuals were enrolled in Medicaid, and 7.2 million individuals were enrolled in CHIP.
  • 39.2 million adults were enrolled in Medicaid, and there were 35.7 million Medicaid child and CHIP enrollees.

Total Medicaid/CHIP enrollment in December 2025 dropped about 1.2% from January 2026, or by around 918,000 people.

Hoo boy. the Washington Insurance Dept isn't burying the lede here:

Thirteen health insurers request average 22.4% rate increase for 2027 individual market

OLYMPIA, Wash. — Thirteen health insurance companies have requested an average rate change of 22.4% for Washington state’s 2027 individual health insurance market. Insurers base requested rate changes on assumptions made about the services their policyholders will use and the cost to deliver that care.

“I know the requested rate changes will be difficult for individuals and families,” said Insurance Commissioner Patty Kuderer. “We’re going to spend the next several months reviewing every assumption made by the insurers to make sure their requests are justified.”

Fourteen insurance companies offered individual plans last year. One of those plans — Providence Health Plan, which had 254 enrollees — will not offer coverage in 2027.

Every year around this time I start my annual individual & small group market rate filing analysis project. This involves spending months painstakingly tracking every insurance carrier rate filing for the upcoming year to determine just how much average insurance policy premiums on the individual market are projected to change.

Carriers tendency to jump in and out of the market, repeatedly revise their requests, and the confusing blizzard of actual filing forms sometimes make it next to impossible to find the specific data I need.

The actual data I need to compile my estimates are actually fairly simple, however. I really only need three pieces of information for each carrier:

  • How many effectuated enrollees they have in ACA-compliant policies this year;
  • The average projected rate change for those policies;
  • Ideally, a breakout of the reasons behind the changes.

Usually the reasons given are fairly vague things like "increased morbidity" (ie, a sicker risk pool) or the like. Sometimes, however, there's a very specific reason given for some or all of the premium changes. Major examples of this include:

Every year around this time I start my annual individual & small group market rate filing analysis project. This involves spending months painstakingly tracking every insurance carrier rate filing for the upcoming year to determine just how much average insurance policy premiums on the individual market are projected to change.

Carriers tendency to jump in and out of the market, repeatedly revise their requests, and the confusing blizzard of actual filing forms sometimes make it next to impossible to find the specific data I need.

The actual data I need to compile my estimates are actually fairly simple, however. I really only need three pieces of information for each carrier:

  • How many effectuated enrollees they have in ACA-compliant policies this year;
  • The average projected rate change for those policies;
  • Ideally, a breakout of the reasons behind the changes.

Usually the reasons given are fairly vague things like "increased morbidity" (ie, a sicker risk pool) or the like. Sometimes, however, there's a very specific reason given for some or all of the premium changes. Major examples of this include:

Just five days ago, Providence Health Plan of Oregon announced that they're shutting down pretty much their entire health insurance provider division next year:

...Providence will stop offering most plans through Providence Health Plan, including individual, family and employer coverage, as it seeks to strengthen its financial footing and refocus on delivering care rather than operating an insurance arm.

...Providence Health Plan, based in Portland, is Oregon’s third-largest health insurer, covering more than 421,000 Oregonians. It also covers over 13,000 members in Washington and 4,800 in California. 

Today, this was followed by another blow to the Beaver State's health insurance market. Via Nick Budnick of The Lund Report:

Pages

Advertisement