Every year, I spend months painstakingly tracking every insurance carrier rate filing (nearly 400 for 2025!) for the following year to determine just how much average insurance policy premiums on the individual market are projected to increase or decrease.
Carriers tendency to jump in and out of the market, repeatedly revise their requests, and the confusing blizzard of actual filing forms sometimes make it next to impossible to find the specific data I need.
I really only need three pieces of information for each carrier:
It was in early 2021 that Congressional Democrats passed & President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), which among other things dramatically expanded & enhanced the original premium subsidy formula of the Affordable Care Act, finally bringing the financial aid sliding income scale up to the level it should have been in the first place over a decade earlier.
In addition to beefing up the subsidies along the entire 100 - 400% Federal Poverty Level (FPL) income scale, the ARPA also eliminated the much-maligned "Subsidy Cliff" at 400% FPL, wherein a household earning even $1 more than that had all premium subsidies cut off immediately, requiring middle-class families to pay full price for individual market health insurance policies.
Here's what the original ACA premium subsidy formula looked like compared to the current, enhanced subsidy formula:
Political battles are usually won based on appealing to emotion, not to facts, policy or logic.
However, you should still have those facts at your disposal for two reasons: First, they still help you craft appeals to emotion. Second, they also help you craft the actual policy. Besides, I'm a data guy; my primary job is to help put facts & policy into easily-understandable context.
Back in March, the Health & Human Services (HHS) Dept. and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) proposed a so-called "Marketplace Integrity & Affordability Rule" which would include sweeping changes to how the ACA exchanges (both the federal one (HealthCare.Gov) and the 20-odd state-based ones (Covered California, MNsure, etc) operate, as well as who is or isn't eligible to enroll in ACA exchange coverage, restrictions on subsidy eligibility and so forth.
Many of these changes are simply repeals/reversals of improvements put into place during the Biden Administration; others are completely new ones being put into place by the Trump Regime under RFK Jr. & Dr. Oz.
However, until today, these were still technically only proposed changes. Now they're official. The final version isn't quite as bad as it could have been, and there's one or two items on the list which I'm not that upset about, but overall...yeah, it's pretty ugly.
Secretary Kennedy, Administrator Oz to Host Press Conference to Discuss Groundbreaking Health Insurance Reform
WASHINGTON, DC—FRIDAY, JUNE 20, 2025—U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Mehmet Oz will host a press conference to discuss a breakthrough in health insurance that will improve access to care for millions of Americans.
WHEN: Monday, June 23 at 2:45 PM ET
Press should arrive by 1:45 PM for priority placement
Press must have REAL ID to enter the building
WHERE:
Hubert H. Humphrey Building Auditorium
200 Independence Ave SW
Washington, D.C. 20009
PARTICIPANTS:
HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz, M.D.
Federal policy shifts drive higher 2026 rates for individual and small group health plans
State actions blunt increases tied to the reconciliation bills and policy direction of the federal government
St. Paul, MN: Health insurers have submitted their proposed increased rates to the Minnesota Department of Commerce for 2026 plans available to Minnesotans who buy individual or small group health insurance through MNsure or directly through insurers. These proposed rates apply to coverage starting Jan. 1, 2026, with open enrollment beginning Nov. 1, 2025.
BCN is filing a year-over-year average rate increase for 2026 for all individual products that were offered in 2025 of 16.3%. Significant contributors to rate change are outlined in the table below:
Experience Restate 4.0%
Medical and pharmaceutical price and utilization trend 5.4%
ARPA Subsidy Expiration Impact 4.6%
Benefit Change and CSR -2.6%
Margin Impact 1.2%
...Incorporated in the above, BCN assumed an additional pharmacy price trend due to tariffs, as follows:
Generic +2.5%
Brand +10%
Specialty 0%
Total Impact +2.5%
...Consistent with the 2025 filing, BCN has assumed no CSR payments will be made by the federal government for 2026. Therefore, rates for Silver plans offered on exchange are 20.5% higher than if the federal government funded CSR subsidies.
Last month, in response to House Republicans passing their version of the budget resolution bill, I broke out total enrollment in Medicaid via ACA expansion, ACA exchange Qualified Health Plan (QHP) enrollment and ACA-based Basic Health Plan (BHP) enrollment by Congressional District in order to try and get a sense of just how many Americans healthcare coverage is at risk from the bill...and how that breaks out along partisan lines at the House District level.
As I noted at the time, Republicans seem to be under the impression that it will mostly be Democrats who get screwed by their bill, since 9 of the 10 non-expansion states are Republican strongholds...while some Democrats seem to be under the impression that it will mostly be rural MAGA republicans who get screwed.
Senate GOP tax bill would hit politically explosive Medicaid provision
The Finance Committee is due to brief members on its megabill draft text Monday night.
Senate Republicans are seeking to ratchet up savings from a politically explosive policy within Medicaid to pay for their megabill, and it’s already setting off shockwaves through Capitol Hill.
The Senate Finance Committee’s forthcoming portion of the party-line tax and spending package would lower the Medicaid provider tax to 3.5 percent, according to three people with direct knowledge of the legislation who were granted anonymity to discuss it.
The 4,000 California National Guard soldiers who President Donald Trump surged into Los Angeles remain unpaid due to delays in issuing official activation orders, leaving compensation and benefits in limbo.
According to more than a dozen Guardsmen across four units who spoke to Military.com, none has received formal activation orders, the critical paperwork that not only authorizes their duty status, but also unlocks pay, Tricare health benefits and eligibility for Department of Veterans Affairs services. Without those orders, troops remain in a legal and administrative limbo.
Multiple defense officials with direct knowledge of the situation told Military.com the chaotic and sudden activation of troops has effectively clogged up the flow of administrative work.
