Yes, I've posted this a couple of times before, but Stewart really does such a fantastic job of boiling the case down to its essence.

(Note: The other case referred to, "Halbig", is a virtually identical case which was basically replaced by the "King" version)

I've been occasionally chastized for my occasional use of less-than-professional language. Terms like "pile of crap" or, rarely, more crass terminology.

Now and then I think, "hey, I should probably tone down the language here!"

And then, the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives, the 3rd in line to the Presidency, is reduced to issuing grade-school insults taken from 3-month old New York Post op-eds written by FOX News correspondents...

#ObamaCare stinks even with subsidies” http://t.co/ZNYfywAkjR

— Speaker John Boehner (@SpeakerBoehner) June 10, 2015

...and suddenly I don't feel too bad about myself.

That is all.

Over at the Washington Post, Greg Sargent notes that Mitch McConnell, as expected, is following the standard Republican playbook when it comes to...well, everything, really: Blame President Obama.

BAIER: Doesn’t this hold some potential problems for the GOP? What do you think the solution is if you have to deal with this quickly?

McCONNELL: Depending on what the Supreme Court decides, we’ll have a proposal that protects the American people from a very bad law. Obamacare was the single worst piece of legislation that’s been passed in the last half century. The single biggest step in the direction of Europeanizing our country…What we will do is offer a proposal to protect the American people.

Setting aside the "Europeanizing" part for the moment (seriously, I always wonder about the impact on foreign policy/diplomatic relations with our allies whenever a Republican says something like this), Sargent lays out the GOP's options:

Four quick stories which aren't quite worth their own full entry:

There's not any new info here, but this bit pretty much summarizes what you'll be seeing across 2/3 of the country in a worst-case scenario:

...HealthCare.gov, the federally run exchange, is where 27-year-old Kathryn Ryan, a restaurant server in Philadelphia, turned for health coverage, as soon as the law took effect.

"I was excited because if it weren't for Obamacare, I wouldn't be insured at all," she says. "I wouldn't have the ability to go to the doctor."

She can afford health insurance thanks to a $200 a month subsidy that brings her premium down to $60 a month.

Ryan, who's also studying social work, is one of nearly 400,000 Pennsylvanians who have qualified for income-based financial assistance. But like a lot of people, she had no idea that a case before the Supreme Court puts at risk the subsidies in states like Pennsylvania that rely on the federally run exchange.

The DC exchange just issued a welcome-but-unexpected update; as usual, they do this weird thing where they're including the cumulative totals dating back to October 1, 2013, which is pretty much pointless (this would be like measuring how well Chrysler is doing in 2015 by counting every car they've sold since 1925).

Still, by simply measuring the difference between the numbers on different dates, it's easy enough to measure:

From October 1, 2013 to April 26, 2015, 106,364 people have enrolled in health insurance coverage through DC Health Link in private insurance or Medicaid:

 22,354 people enrolled in a private qualified health plan,
 67,761 people have been determined eligible for Medicaid, and
 16,249 people enrolled through the DC Health Link small business marketplace (includes Congressional enrollment)

Today's update:

In my latest exclusive over at healthinsurance.org, I break out the post-King v. Burwell carnage by the numbers. The short version?

  • Around 6.5 Million people losing an average of $272 per month in tax credits
  • Likely around 8.5 Million people losing their healthcare coverage entirely
  • Likely around 4.5 million people having to pay exorbitant rates in order to hold onto their policies
  • A potential additional "bonus" bit of nastiness for millions of people which I'm praying wouldn't come to pass

While I go into the detail on each of these in the full entry, here's a table showing how it all breaks out.

Column A is the hard effectuated APTC-receiving enrollees as of 3/31, directly from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid report last week.

With the King v. Burwell Supreme Court decision imminent (anytime between now and June 29th), the chess pieces have been set.

President Obama's Strategy:

Four words in the law could unravel Obamacare in the Supreme Court. So President Barack Obama is marshaling his own numbers – and an unusual moral weight — to stress the achievements of his health overhaul law on Tuesday.

In a speech to the Catholic Health Association, Obama will talk about the hundred years it’s taken to reform healthcare in the United States, and the millions it has helped over its five years of implementation. With a ruling due by the end of the month that could potentially send the new insurance marketplaces into a tailspin, Obama will warn, the social contract is at stake.

...On Tuesday, Obama will try to transcend the legal issues and political debate and instead focus on what the law has accomplished.

As I noted last month, Colorado's exchange reports are both crammed full of useful data and very confusing at the same time. Fortunately, with the help of Louise Norris, it should be a bit easier to figure out this time around (plus, during the off-season some of the numbers aren't as crucial anyway).

The total paid enrollment as of 5/31/15 is 73,438 + 54,811 = 128,249 people.

The number of these which were effectuated as of 5/31 appears to be 131,496 - 2,493 (SHOP) - 4,496 (Dental Only) = 124,507 people as of the end of May.

As I expected, this is a slight increase from 122,976 as of 3/31/15, which is actually more impressive since Colorado is one of the 3 states which didn't offer any sort of #ACATaxTime enrollment period after Open Enrollment ended.

Chutzpah (noun): A child who murders his parents, then begs forgiveness because he's an orphan.

"Six million people risk losing their health care subsidies, yet @POTUS continues to deny that Obamacare is bad for the American people."

— Senator John Thune (@SenJohnThune) June 8, 2015

Unbelievable. I've seen santorum with more integrity than this tweet. That is all.

UPDATE: Thune's tweet is a reminder of this bit of jaw-dropping hypocrisy from Florida Governor Rick Scott.

UPDATE x2: Hah! Looks like Paul Krugman was thinking along the same lines (I beat him to the punch, though...)

Pages

Advertisement