# Follow-up: Just how much MORE could MLR rebates be next year if the CSR lawsuit ruling holds?

OK, I know, I know, I'm obsessing over this and I promise to stop soon.

Yesterday I noted that due to a surreal, Rube Goldberg-esque series of events dating back to a **different** lawsuit filed back in **2014** by then-Speaker of the House John Boehner (!), it's looking very likely that the federal government will have to shell out at least $1.6 billion in Cost Sharing Reduction (CSR) reimbursement payments to over 100 health insurance carriers **even though those carriers have already made up most of their losses elsewhere in the form of increased premium rates**.

Adding to the insanity, however, thanks to the** ACA's Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) provision** limiting carriers on the individual market to **no more than a 20% gross margin**, a big chunk of that $1.6 billion--assuming the court decision ultimately holds up on appeal and the government actually does pay up--would then have to in turn be rebated to the policyholders in kind. More specifically, they have to pay out at least 80% of premium revenue on actual medical claims; anything less than that has to be rebated to the policyholders.

Read this link from February for the backstory, and then read yesterday's piece for the details on yesterday's court ruling, which breaks out the exact dollar amounts (to the penny!) that the feds have been ordered to pay out to every individual carrier. Remember, there are two amounts: The first is for the last 3 months of 2017 (**these** payments, totalling around $131 million collectively, shouldn't be in dispute by anyone, since they **weren't** "made up for" by the carriers). The second, usually much larger amounts ($1.46 billion collectively) cover the **full 2018 calendar year**.

It's the $1.46 billion which was the real jaw-dropper and which has potentially massive implications going forward. To my knowledge, most of the 100-odd carriers involved in the lawsuit (and others like it...there's a couple dozen nationally, I believe, although this one is by far the largest) weren't even planning on trying to get reimbursed for the **2018** CSR payments in the first place, since they had already covered that by raising their premiums an extra 14% or so starting in 2018.

In any event, as I noted yesterday, even if the payments are ultimately made, not **all** of the ~$1.6 billion will actually have to be paid out in MLR rebates, for a few reasons.

For one thing, the rebate calculation is based on a **3-year rolling average**. That means that even if it was the full $1.6 billion, the rebates would be **spread out** over a 3-year period. Assuming the payments are made in full in 2020, and assuming the payments were** not** entered on a cash basis by the carriers, they'd have to back-date their 2017 and 2018 financial records, then figure out what portion of the additional funds has to be paid to each policyholder (not a fun task!) on top of whatever payments were already made in 2018 & this year.

In addition, not every insurance carrier broke the 20% gross margin threshold in 2017 or 2018...and even if they did in one or both years, the rebate calculation is based on a **3-year rolling average**. That means if they had a truly terrible year in 2016 (hitting, say, 95% MLR), the 3-year average could still be over 80% if they hit, say, 76% in 2017 and 72% in 2018. If the additional CSR lawsuit judgment amounts to, say, 1% of their gross revenues from both 2017 & 2018, their 3-year average would still be over 80%, meaning they'd still owe nothing in rebates.

As you can see in the table below, I've gone back through my big MLR Rebate Project to try and estimate just how much **more** each carrier in the Common Ground lawsuit (that's the lead named plaintiff in the class action case) might have to rebate next year **beyond** what I already estimated their 2019 MLR rebate totals would be **without** these additional settlement funds.

IMPORTANT: I'm making a **lot** of big assumptions here, so do **not** take any of the amounts below as a given; I could be wildly off on many of them. Furthermore, the court ruling could be overturned by a higher court, making all of this moot...and even if the payments are eventually made, that might not happen until 2021 or 2022. Finally, it's possible that the payments would be entered on a "cash basis", meaning they'd be plugged into whatever year the checks actually show up in. If that happens, there wouldn't be **any** additional MLR rebates until, again, 2021 or 2022.

HAVING SAID THAT, here's what I came up with: If all of my assumptions prove to be accurate, **roughly $329 million (21% of the $1.6 billion total)** would be paid out to enrollees from 2017 & 2018 next year, more than doubling the $300 million I had already assumed would be paid out to enrollees of these particular carriers.

It's also important to note that this judgment only relates to the ~100 carriers in this particular lawsuit. These carriers only represent around 25% of the total MLR amount paid out last month. There are several other similar cases which have received similar rulings from federal judges, so it's conceivable that **the national total could be around 4x as much!**

**UPDATE:** (Sigh) I went through a ton of effort to compile the table above...only to be informed by Wesley Sanders (who I trust on this sort of thing) that I was doing the calculations wrong--instead of **adding** the judgement payments to the **denominator** of each carrier's yearly revenue, I was supposed to **subtract** it from the yearly **numerator:**

In all prior years it's always been an offset to claims.If it rolls into MLR I can't see a good reason why they would change it, soit should be a reduction in the numeratorI think.— Wesley Sanders (@wcsanders) October 25, 2019

As Sanders noted, this makes absolutely no difference in terms of the net profits of the carriers in question...$5 is $5, after all...but in terms of MLR rebates, which are based on **percentages**, it can make a big difference. Here's why:

- Let's say a carrier took in exactly $1,000,000 in premium revenue, and paid out exactly $800,000 in medical claims. That gives them a Medical Loss Ratio of exactly 80.0%.
- Now let's say that they receive a $50,000 CSR judgment payment from the Common Ground lawsuit.
- If you count that $50,000 as
**additional premium revenue**(the denominator), you would divide $800,000 into $1,050,000 to get a MLR of**76.2%** - If, however, you
**subtract**that $50,000 as an**offset**to the**medical claims**(the numerator), y ou would divide $750,000 into $1,000,000 to get a MLR of**75.0%.**

That's a difference of 1.2 percentage points. Again, that may not sound like much, but when you're talking about hundreds of millions, or even billions of dollars, it can add up quickly. It can even make the difference between a carrier having to pay rebates at all or not having to.

With that in mind, I went back and re-ran the numbers for all 100 carriers, this time entering the CSR judgment funds as a claim offset (subtracted from the numerator)...and it made a pretty big difference: Over $100 million in additional rebate payments, inlcuding three carriers which wouldn't have had to pay anything at all if it was calculated the other way.