Vermont releases 1st detailed report: 92% Jan-start paid, 80% paid overall
 Until now, aside from the official monthly HHS reports, Vermont's enrollment data has been frustrating--not that it hasn't been available, it's just been released in confusing dollops (Massachusetts falls into the same category). Today, however, the Vermont Health Connect exchange released a detailed PDF that does a great job of answering the key questions--along with one bit of data I haven't seen for any other state so far: The breakdown not only of total Private QHP enrollments, but how many of these started in January, February and (upcoming) March.
Until now, aside from the official monthly HHS reports, Vermont's enrollment data has been frustrating--not that it hasn't been available, it's just been released in confusing dollops (Massachusetts falls into the same category). Today, however, the Vermont Health Connect exchange released a detailed PDF that does a great job of answering the key questions--along with one bit of data I haven't seen for any other state so far: The breakdown not only of total Private QHP enrollments, but how many of these started in January, February and (upcoming) March.
Page 6 has the key data: A total of 16,906 QHP enrollees as of 2/10, of whom 13,514 are paid up. Overall, this points to an 80% paid rate, which is very good--but the monthly breakout is even more interesting: January-start enrollees have a 92% paid rate (which you'd certainly hope for by now, considering that we're into mid-February) and February-start enrollees are at 79% paid. The March-start enrollees (14%) are the ones providing the main drag on the total...but this is hardly shocking since the start date for that coverage is still over 2 weeks away.

Hopefully this helps put last night's entry, in which I pointed out that across 4 other states (WA, WI, NV and RI) only 55% of enrollees are paid into perspective. The Wisconsin story stated that their 50% payment ratio specifically applied to January-start coverage, but the other 3 states didn't distinguish between the monthly start dates, so I'm pretty sure that the earlier enrollments (Jan/Feb-starts) have a higher batting average and are being dragged down by the March-start additions. WIth the addition of Vermont, these 5 states combined now stand at 153,698 paid / 119,164 unpaid, or about 56.3% paid overall.
Meanwhile, Vermont's Medicaid enrollment number stands at 13,273.




